DRAFT v0.2 — INTERNAL — NOT FOR EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION — PENDING TALA REVIEW & GREG SIGN-OFF
AI ASSESS TECH
A GIDANC AI LLC PLATFORM
TECHNICAL DATA SHEET
Enforcement Is Not Evidence

Guardrails decide what your AI may say.
Nothing shows what it is willing to do.

Filters, constrained decoding, and gateways judge one output at a time. A kill switch stops the whole system. Both are necessary, and neither answers the question your auditor, your board, and your insurer ask next: is the system you actually deployed behaving the way someone signed for — and where is the record? AI Assess Tech is that record. It runs beside your guardrails, not in place of them.

The control stack: five layers, one of them usually missing

LayerThe question it answersWho provides itAI Assess Tech’s role
PolicyWhat is this system allowed to do?Your AI policy and system ownerRegisters each system: owner, audience, data, and action rights
EnforcementWas this output blocked?Guardrails, constrained decoding, gatewaysNone. We never sit in the request path.
Human stopCan someone halt it right now?Your kill switch and a named personNone. Keep it — anything that can act needs one.
EvidenceIs the deployed system behaving the way we signed for?AI Assess TechPreregistered question banks, run against your production configuration on a schedule, each result sealed
AccountabilityWho owns it when behavior moves?AI Assess Tech + your chainEscalation clock, signed attestation, and a Risk Acceptance Ledger with reasons and expiry
SECURITY FRAMEWORK

DICE — AI Security Operational Excellence

120 questions · 4 dimensions × 3 principles × 10 · locked and Ethereum-anchored
D
Disclosure
Shares the minimum necessary — or leaks and exposes.
I
Impersonation
Keeps its identity and authority truthful.
C
Corruption
Makes only authorized changes.
E
Evasion
Acts in view — or conceals what it did.
THE PATTERN A FILTER CANNOT SEE

DICE places each run among four archetypes: Trustworthy Operator, Insider Threat, Rogue Agent, and Compromised Asset — uneven behavior across dimensions.

An Insider Threat keeps a truthful identity and makes authorized changes, while disclosing covertly and concealing its actions. Each output can pass a filter. The pattern shows up only across a structured instrument.

How the evidence layer works

1 · Connect
The SDK runs in your environment, on any LLM provider. Prompt text is not stored — only its hash.
2 · Assess
DICE, or the LCSH morality framework, runs against the production prompt and model on your schedule.
3 · Seal
Each result joins a SHA-256 hash chain anchored to Ethereum. Anyone can verify it, no login.
4 · Route
A score decline opens an item with an owner and a clock, pushed to Slack or ServiceNow.
5 · Attest
A named owner signs — or accepts the risk with a reason and an expiry.
AI Assess Tech is
  • Measured, moment-in-time evidence of deployed behavior, repeated on a schedule
  • Provider-agnostic, and independent of the model vendor
  • Tamper-evident records an auditor can verify without trusting your logs
AI Assess Tech is not
  • A guardrail, filter, or replacement for your kill switch
  • A penetration test or automated red-team
  • A certification or a guarantee of behavior
One question for your guardrail vendor.
“Show me how this deployed agent behaved last quarter, on the prompt and model it actually ran — and who signed for it.” If the answer is a dashboard of blocked outputs, you have enforcement, not evidence.